Thank you ed, much more eloquent than my own statement. except the anarchy part,
its different than that. ;)
--Christopher
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 02:44:41PM -0700, Edward Craig wrote:
> We decided on anarchic organisation when we launched eug-lug to
> avoid infighting, and it's mostly worked.
> That Linux itself is anarchic in organisation is relevent.
> That some eugluggers are also anarchists is OK, after all, if we
> can put up with Greens, Republicans, even Democrats, why not anarchists?
> Yeah, we have hippies on board, and faux-hippies and dreadlocked
> deadheads, skinheads, punks and buttoned-down preppies, even suits.
> Anarchists will automatically reject ANY authority's definition of
> anarchy, even another anarchist's on (almost any) occasion.
> The only principle I've seen all anarchists reject is that anybody
> has a right to followers. Although followers may form up behind a leader,
> they're free to bug out at the followers' whim.
> As are eugluggers.
>
> --
> Ed Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Taxi (I need an income) GNU/Linux (I can afford a Free OS)
> Think this through with me, let me know your mind... Hunter/Garcia
>
>
>
--
Christopher Maujean
IT Director
Premierelink Communications
www.premierelink.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE encrypt all sensitive information using the following:
GnuPG: 0x5DE74D38
Fingerprint: 91D4 09FE 18D0 27C1 A857 0E45 F8A4 7858 5DE7 4D38
http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5DE74D38
