I tried both (sorry ftp.kernel.org), and discovered it's 2.4.10 that you need to patch.
I've got gkrellm running here, and using plain 2.4.10, the memory on reboot would show almost 50% usage. Using 2.4.10-ac4, the memory usage is less than 25%. (Both under Xwindows). That alone makes me like ac4 better. :) -Rob > On 20011003.2229, Rob Hudson said ... > > Alan just released 2.4.10-ac4, which is a 2.4.10 merge minus the VM > change. Does this mean it is a 2.4.10 tree with the applied patch? > or a 2.4.9 tree? I would think it's .10, but the changlog makes it > look like one big patch. ??? > > Thanks, > Rob > > -- > Rob <rob_at_euglug_dot_net> > my @euglugCode = qw(v+++ e--- eug+ bsd+++ gnu+ S+++); > > -- Rob <rob_at_euglug_dot_net> my @euglugCode = qw(v+++ e--- eug+ bsd+++ gnu+ S+++);
