Justin Bengtson wrote:

> who drops offenders?  what is considered a huge enough offense to drop
> someone from the list?  what is considered "appropriate" behavior?  would
> the list admin even CONSIDER dropping such favorites as Seth, Patrick, KBob,
> or any of the other long-time subscribees for inappropriate behavior?  (no
> offense given, it's just an example.  i would hate to see them leave.)
> 
> if i express an opinion or share a life experience and am later shot down,
> flamed, whatever, because what i am talking about/promoting is basically
> anathema, or perceived of as, to our *nix community, who is using the
> in-appropriate behavior?

I'm not sure whether these questions are rhetorical or you want an
answer.  But I think the answer, in any case, is, "It depends."
Rather than try to preformulate a policy document for acceptable use
of the mailing list that covers all hypothetical cases, let's play it
by ear.  That will work for the simple reason that most of us want to
be reasonable people most of the time.  If we manage to recruit a
bona-fide asshole, or we get two perfectly reasonable people who hate
each other passionately and can't control themselves, then we'll need
to decide what to do in that particular circumstance.  In the
meantime, we can all just get along.*

In engineering terms, we have lazy evaluation of our list policy. (-:

Since I've already gotten longwinded, and nobody is still reading me,
here's my take on mailing lists/newsgroups/etc.  The two mailing list
thing is not working.  It's like being at a party where the host told
you, "Go into the other room if you're going to discuss politics."  It
doesn't happen.  People talk, and politics come up, and nobody
interrupts and says, "We have to go to the other room now," or if they
do, they're ignored.  We're friends.  We talk about what interests us.
Linux brings us together, but then we digress.

OTOH, list members have already complained when long threads go off
topic.  I don't have a good answer for those who wish this list
had lower volume.

But I *would* like to see a eug-lug-announce mailing list.  It would
only contain announcements of meetings and the like, and would
probably be moderated.  That list would be for the people who don't
want to join the general conversation but do want to know what EUGLUG
is doing.

Sorry, Patrick, but IMO netnews is dead and smelly, and nothing but a
spam haven.  The fact that only six people used eug.comp.os.linux (sp?)
is a strong indicator.

* This paragraph will sound very familiar to Anarchists and Anarchist
  sympathizers.  But I'm not going to put a label on it, not me! (-:

-- 
Bob Miller                              K<bob>
kbobsoft software consulting
http://kbobsoft.com                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to