actually, ben, the "isms" list was a joke (gawd, i hope people take it as
such...  of course, i don't HAVE to subscribe...)  i guess i don't make
myself too tone-clear.

or y'all are tone-deaf!  haha!

that's the problem with e-mail, really.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Barrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [EUG-LUG:412] RE: Bobs for bobs
> 
> 
> I think we are simply tired of excess off-topic bulk;  the 
> bob art and 
> also recent jokes
> just haven't done anything for me... maybe for others though, 
> so I don't 
> mind so much.
> But didn't we just decide to reorganize and keep better focus, esp in 
> terms of sigs:
> things not-quite pertaining to the main list can be spawned 
> elsewhere -- 
> unless of course
> it's just not gratifying to get no response since they are 
> mostly dead!!!
> 
> I think we should go ahead and make the isms list, but we're 
> also going 
> to need an
> ism-isms list (or 'meta-isms' aw it were...) just because 
> there's sure 
> to be people on
> the isms list who are off-topic, and really just want to spread isms, 
> instead of being
> good and spreading their own particular ism /-;
> Bob IS an ism, unarguably.  I say 'unarguably' as though it were 
> impossible to
> reply in an argumentative tone... anyone who cares to OUGHT 
> to be lazy 
> enough
> not to, if I understand the Church of the Subgenius's 
> doctrines correctly.
> 
> Linux Rocks ! wrote:
> 
> >Jeez... whine and complain about one message with ascii art 
> for the bobs 
> >(pres and vice pres...)  nobody is trying to spread isms... 
> your welcome to 
> >make whatever you like out of anything want I suppose... 
> Sorry if my one post 
> >with some ascii was tooo unbearable for you.
> >
> >Jamie
> >
> >On Tuesday 04 December 2001 14:45, you wrote:
> >
> >>great.  they've infected the EUGLUG as well...  can you 
> guys take the
> >>discordianism, bobism and all your other isms and put the 
> on the activism
> >>list?  most "isms" belong there.  better yet, why don't y'all make a
> >>mailing list called "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"?  then you can 
> discuss golden apples
> >>and slack to your heart's content and avoid gripers such as 
> mr. barret and
> >>myself.
> >>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: Woody Mims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:27 PM
> >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>Subject: [EUG-LUG:408] RE: Bobs for bobs WAS: Re: Re: An incomplete
> >>>meeting agenda for tomorrow
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>It seems OBVIOUS that our friend Jamie is not only a Master
> >>>of Slack, he's
> >>>also a subgenii and an Erisian Pope! All hail Eris!
> >>>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to