On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Seth Cohn wrote: > I've used Postnuke for more than a year now... and I have to say that it works. > It's not the prettiest, but understanding the problems in development, I have > seen it get better and better... and I can easily hack on it, which says > something good.
and if the details are too complex you can just order your minions to take care of it for you, damn, I gotta get me some minions.. > --- Larry Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry Bob, it really is a mess under the hood, > > why d'you think it takes it 30 seconds to authenticate a login > > when it's pretty much the only thing running on a 900Mhz 512MB box? > > Doesn't take that long... sorry. "Hang on tight, logging you in!" > > > And if every site wanted to be a cutrate slashdot.... > > Bad choice. It can and does a lot... and you can turn off whatever you don't > want. My quel rational arguments. > > Just another take... Perhaps I have been a little harsh about the product under discussion, but my take is that postnuke does some things passably, but nothing well. note: my feelings are probably affected by the fact that it's been forced on me in a context where it's being used to hang a bunch of bells and whistles on a project whose architecture is still in flux and whose primary functions are still not not worked out, mostly because the project team is a mess because one members ideas are immune to criticism... -- http://www.efn.org/~laprice ( Community, Cooperation, Consensus http://www.opn.org ( Openness to serendipity, make mistakes http://www.efn.org/~laprice/poems ( but learn from them.(carpe fructus ludi) _______________________________________________ Eug-lug mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
