I wouldn't be so sure of that, but I am generally comfortable with the incompetence and complacency of the operator behind the machine.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/660096.asp -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Beaker (aka Jeff W) Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Eug-lug]IAO, the history machine, and you > Some disturbing platitudes. (what exactly is 'truth maintenance'?) > > http://www.darpa.mil/iao/ I do see one upside to this otherwise gloomy situation: with lots of DARPA $$$ significant progress might be made in the AI field. I do wonder how sucessful goverment snooping of encrypted email would be? I was under the impression that multi-encrypted files are for all practical puposes uncrackable, at least in any timely manner. Is that not the case? ~Beaker _______________________________________________ Eug-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug _______________________________________________ Eug-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
