Yet another reason to not use RedScat. so... do you think at&t is optimized for win98? maybe they trhottle base on uname -r ?
Jamie On Tuesday 17 December 2002 09:57 pm, Horst wrote: : Recently I installed RH 8.0 from the demo CDs and noticed very slow : download rates over cable (for the time being completely ignoring : upload). Though I did a custom install there was little to config since RH : detected and suggested DHCP (except the funny thing(*) below). For : security I picked 'medium', that's iptables with DHCP traffic allowed plus : ssh and http service, which I added. : : Web browsing under RH 8.0/cable is slower than on a good phone line : connection under win98. Similar for plain console operation, like scp -- : putty scp on win98 is about 10 times faster (see clips below for a 70MB : download, server far away). I noticed slower transfer rates with older : 'nix installations before, but those were installed before adding cable : (so I just blamed myself for not tweaking). : In short, this is not distro specific, and doesn't seem to be application : layer dependent (on both GUI and console): always, transfer using win98 : applications is much faster )-: : I also added traceroute for both OS's, though only the 1st hop should be : of interest(if at all), right? : : Any hints? --for either cure or diagnostic ? (I am willing to dig through : long logs of ngrep or ethereal *if* needed) : : - Horst : (*) the funny thing on RH 8.0 is that DHCP client doesn't seem to be able : to get a hostname from ATT, thus using the entire MAC address of eth0 plus : other crap as my host name in the command line prompt (leaving only 50% : for me to type commands... until I manually set hostname) : : THe following records follow... : : ===== win98 / putty scp ======= : xyz.sql.zip | 23480 kB | 119.2 kB/s | ETA: 00:06:24 |33% : xyz.sql.zip | 69311 kB | 109.8 kB/s | ETA: 00:00:00 |100% : => about 10 min for 70 MB : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ : : ======= RH 8.0 ======== : xyz.sql.zip 10% |****** <snip>| 7004 KB 1:36:31 ETA : ...Killed by signal 2. : => would have taken 1.5 hrs : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ : : ===== win98: ============ : Tracing route to 66.178.136.22 (www.efn.org) over a maximum of 30 hops : : 1 14 ms 9 ms 10 ms 10.139.x.y : 2 8 ms 9 ms 8 ms 12.244.85.1 : 3 10 ms 25 ms 10 ms 12.244.64.213 : 4 66 ms 13 ms 12 ms 12.244.64.209 : 5 12 ms 18 ms 13 ms 12.244.64.205 : 6 17 ms 18 ms 18 ms 12.244.72.42 : 7 17 ms 16 ms 17 ms 12.123.44.57 : 8 17 ms 21 ms 17 ms 12.122.5.157 : 9 75 ms 32 ms 34 ms 12.122.2.61 : 10 33 ms 32 ms 37 ms 12.123.13.69 : 11 37 ms 37 ms 41 ms 12.123.221.2 : 12 37 ms 39 ms 41 ms 208.186.87.13 : 13 41 ms 38 ms 40 ms 207.173.114.141 : 14 88 ms 38 ms 75 ms 208.186.21.33 : 15 42 ms 45 ms 42 ms 207.173.114.58 : 16 45 ms 42 ms 43 ms 208.186.20.241 : 17 60 ms 57 ms 61 ms 207.173.115.41 : 18 149 ms 93 ms 202 ms 208.186.20.129 : 19 57 ms 58 ms 59 ms 216.190.151.142 : 20 62 ms 61 ms 64 ms 66.178.135.110 : 21 68 ms 68 ms 61 ms 206.96.130.251 : 22 * * * Request timed out. : 23 64 ms 67 ms 66 ms 66.178.137.37 : 24 67 ms 100 ms 77 ms 66.178.136.22 : : Trace complete. : : ======== RH 8.0: =============== : 1 10.139.x.y 9.869 ms 8.270 ms 9.986 ms : 2 12.244.85.1 9.472 ms 11.891 ms 24.743 ms : 3 12.244.64.213 29.435 ms 9.673 ms 8.349 ms : 4 12.244.64.209 15.013 ms 24.729 ms 9.878 ms : 5 12.244.64.205 11.819 ms 13.417 ms 12.651 ms : 6 12.244.72.42 14.729 ms 23.798 ms 19.512 ms : 7 12.123.44.57 18.581 ms 18.220 ms 14.856 ms : 8 12.122.5.157 27.143 ms 14.280 ms 16.127 ms : 9 12.122.2.61 31.305 ms 32.376 ms 37.096 ms : 10 12.123.13.69 32.957 ms 31.939 ms 35.193 ms : 11 12.123.221.2 37.626 ms 37.957 ms 38.613 ms : 12 208.186.87.13 38.813 ms 39.686 ms 38.005 ms : 13 207.173.114.141 73.291 ms 62.231 ms 53.878 ms : 14 208.186.21.33 41.366 ms 40.519 ms 39.219 ms : 15 207.173.114.58 41.493 ms 53.242 ms 42.126 ms : 16 208.186.20.241 46.523 ms 46.071 ms 44.927 ms : 17 207.173.115.41 54.712 ms 94.296 ms 77.950 ms : 18 208.186.20.129 57.697 ms 59.497 ms 56.909 ms : 19 216.190.151.142 56.408 ms 68.434 ms 57.192 ms : 20 66.178.135.110 61.916 ms 65.592 ms 63.018 ms : 21 206.96.130.251 67.022 ms 61.514 ms 102.045 ms : 22 * * * : 23 66.178.137.37 63.124 ms 64.825 ms 65.743 ms : 24 66.178.136.22 64.106 ms 64.196 ms 95.871 ms : : : _______________________________________________ : Eug-LUG mailing list : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug -- No microsoft products were used to produce this message. EUG-LUG Mailing List: http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug _______________________________________________ Eug-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug