Hhm, sounds like interesting material for an open-format LUG topic. I'd love to see that conversation between the two of you 'on stage' at EFN HQ. I have one client where I have to make sendmail/bind configurations, eventually getting it done somehow, never w/o bruises, never with sufficient time to experiment since their site is alive with people waiting for mail delivery... in short, I definitely would be interested.
As for the format -casual round-table presentations- I thought our first run in Fall turned out well; then Cory and Ralph set higher standards, but it doesn't have to be always like that all the time, as far as I am concerned. To throw in one more, recently Joseph Crtr. expanded on grub vs. lilo. I'd love to hear more about that at, let's say as a 20 min pres. followed by Q/As -- in connection with another topic, like the one above. My 5 centi-euros ............................ Horst On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Jacob Meuser wrote: > On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 05:28:30AM +0000, Bob Crandell wrote: > > > >;; ANSWERS: > > >ocicat.crandell.net. 7146 CNAME sd1.mailbank.com. > > >sd1.mailbank.com. 1426 A 64.15.175.5 > > > > > >It looks like ocicat and sd1 are the same machine. > > I don't know how that works. ocicat.crandell.net is 192.168.1.2 > > The name servers at mailbank.com are saying that ocicat.crandell.net > is a CNAME (alias) for sd1.mailbank.com. > > > >> I set up an alias that looks like: > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> Now it sends but they refuse it. Sigh. > > > > > >; <<>> DiG 2.2 <<>> crandell.net.criticalpath.net MX > > >;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch > > >;; got answer: > > >;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 58505 > > >;; flags: qr rd ra; Ques: 1, Ans: 0, Auth: 1, Addit: 0 > > >;; QUESTIONS: > > >;; crandell.net.criticalpath.net, type = MX, class = IN > > > > > >;; AUTHORITY RECORDS: > > >criticalpath.net. 406 SOA ns1.cp.net. hostmaster.cp.net. ( > > > 2643734399 ; serial > > > 1200 ; refresh (20 mins) > > > 300 ; retry (5 mins) > > > 2149200 ; expire (24 days 21 hours) > > > 10800 ) ; minimum (3 hours) > > > > > >;; Total query time: 6 msec > > >;; FROM: funk to SERVER: default -- 192.168.1.88 > > >;; WHEN: Mon Dec 23 17:07:09 2002 > > >;; MSG SIZE sent: 47 rcvd: 117 > > > > > > > > >crandell.net.criticalpath.net has no MX ... no mail routing > > >information for that machine is available. Eventually, it comes > > >back to sender, and the sender refuses. > > I'll try some more variations and see if I can find a way in. > > I use an explicit MX record for each host, as well as default > for the domain. > > $ORIGIN . > $TTL 21600 ; 6 hours > jakemsr.com IN SOA funk.jakemsr.com. postmaster.funk.jakemsr.com. ( > 2001011301 ; serial > 3600 ; refresh (1 hour) > 1800 ; retry (30 minutes) > 604800 ; expire (1 week) > 3600 ; minimum (1 hour) > ) > NS sly.jakemsr.com. > NS funk.jakemsr.com. > A 64.42.83.115 > MX 10 funk.jakemsr.com. > $ORIGIN jakemsr.com. > funk A 64.42.83.116 > MX 10 funk > sly A 64.42.83.117 > MX 10 funk > www A 64.42.83.115 > MX 10 funk > > -- > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > It furthers the question, "Is a 99 cent burger a good deal?" > _______________________________________________ > Eug-LUG mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug > _______________________________________________ Eug-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
