Around Wed,Mar 26 2003, at 04:48, Ben Barrett, wrote: > I noticed that today, too, just minutes ago -- nice to see that the > Oregonian is running a piece about "Ken's Bill" too!! > Way to go, open sores = )) > > BenB > > > PS - linuxtoday links to the oregonian article... would also like to > point out that this "Bill" is not at all about anti-M$ or being > Micro$oft-free... it has to do with forcing gov't agencies to CONSIDER > the open source alternatives, which are indeed often overlooked since > there aren't many vendors out there, replying to the typical gov't RFP > (request for proposal) or contract about such free-software alternatives
Not just open source software, the data needs to be in an open source format (ie, non-propriety). -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From /usr/bin/fortune: I know engineers. They love to change things. - Dr. McCoy _______________________________________________ Eug-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
