On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 12:24 PM, Bob Miller wrote:
Larry Price wrote:
spamassassin is a filtering solution analogous to using a pitchfork on a river in flood, it's effective at moving debris out of the way, but it's not exactly selective...
My question about all this is, does spamassassin's Bayesian component use per-user filter tables or a single global table? As installed at EFN, that is.
The current setup is not the final setup, we are currently moving towards per user whitelists
but the Bayesian filter is probably most useful as a global weight. The trend I notice being that spam is generally more similar than different, otherwise every one's filter will have to learn the same patterns again.
"Microsoft has resolved this issue. We have put processes in place to ensure there is no recurrence of this eventuality." -Microsoft
"You are the eventuality of an anomaly , which despite my sincerest efforts I have been unable to eliminate from what is otherwise a harmony of mathematical precision. " -The Architect
_______________________________________________ EuG-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
