Ive actually had decent experience with authorize.net. I've used them with a few customers, and mostly good service, however I have had troubles with another company that aparently was owned by them... but thats completely unrelated probably.
Its been a few years, but I used commerce.cgi (shopping cart, perl based) with their service w/out any troubles... I was able to heavily modify the cart w/ out breaking stuff. I think commerce.cgi has gone away now, but something must have replaced it! hopefully what your dealing with is compatable. Authorize.net isnt the only game in town though... I wouldnt recommend versign/signio to anyone though. Jamie On Friday 14 November 2003 02:49 pm, Larry Price wrote: : Has anybody on this list had to deal with : authorize.net from a unix environment? : : Comments, experiences? : : Are there any payment authorization gateways that are in the set of : (not crewed by vampires && not Microsoft centric) ? : : We've been using trustcommerce.com : and while as a programmer, I found their interface to be : straightforward and : their documentation excellent, the per transaction charges are fierce. : : : -- : "You are the eventuality of an anomaly , which despite my sincerest : efforts I have been unable to eliminate from what is otherwise a : harmony : of mathematical precision. " -The Architect : "Microsoft has resolved this issue. We have put processes in place to : ensure there is no recurrence of this eventuality." -Microsoft : : _______________________________________________ : EuG-LUG mailing list : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug -- >Ever heard of .cshrc? That's a city in Bosnia. Right? -- Discussion in comp.os.linux.misc on the intuitiveness of commands _______________________________________________ EuG-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
