I also get a large amount of spam that IS trapped by spamassassin. I don't believe that my spam assassin settings have anything to do with this, other than the fact that spamassassin is enabled on my account, and has been since the very beginning of the efn implementation. All other email I get at my efn address is marked by spamassassin one way or the other (spam or not spam). As I mentioned below, there are No spamassassin headers in the spam I am talking about.
I guess my complete question, away from any specific account is as follows.
Why would a spamassassin setup such as efn.org's completely miss 3-10 spam emails a day, where miss is defined as not process at all.
Darren Hayes wrote:
See today's "EFN message about spam" announce from EFN Sysadmin on how to configure individualized spam filtering. Way to go EFN! (If you don't have an EFN account please disregard).
----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Maujean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Eugene Unix and GNU/Linux User Group's mail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:49 AM
Subject: Re: [eug-lug] I am getting SP***M - I apologize,...
gottenI have been getting a fair amount of spam in my efn inbox that looks like it is not being processed by the spam servers (no spamassassin headers). How are these getting through, and how would I plug up that hole? I'm considering spamassassin for my mail server and need to know how to deal with the issues. Any spamassassin experts want to jump in and give us a quick dissertation?
Thanks, Christopher Maujean
Linux Rocks ! wrote:
Hal,
If the spam you received had gone through the list, we all would have
thanit. I dont think that Ive seen that specific one, so I cant even say its
anyway associated with the list.
Ironicly, the email address I usually use on this list gets less spam
archives asany other email address I use! I dont really see the list, or its
1995,beeing an issue for spam.
My EFN account gets a ton of spam however. Ive had that account since
ofand the rocksolidnetworks address since 1999, so it just may be a matter
period ofone address being used more than the other, and around for a longer
here intime. I also only use the linux email address for mailing lists (both
includedthe DC area, and back home in eugene. The linux address is also not
spamin mailto: links on my webpage, but other address's that do get a lot of
nailare..
At anyrate, your always welcome to express concerns... sorry we couldnt
anythingthe source of your spam, but I havnt seen any effective way to do
about it... filtering is about your only option.
Jamie
On Thursday 11 December 2003 12:12 am, Harald Sundt wrote: : ...I am not certain why these things work the way they do, but if you : say it ain't the List, then I retract my cracked and yellow parrot's : beak of peak. : : : H : _______________________________________________ : EuG-LUG mailing list : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
_______________________________________________ EuG-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
_______________________________________________ EuG-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
