Yeah, I don't swing that way either.

> Yeah, I don't swing that way, either, but that has nothing to do with
> this list or the bash shell.  More specifically, I don't bash those who
> do swing that way....
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:57:53 -0800
> Max wrote:
>
> | And here I thought you were referring to a Baptist revival meeting...
> | -Max
> |
> | Ben B wrote:
> |
> | >Well I should clarify, that is a gross idea to me.  I am admittedly |
>>hetero, and don't want to FEEL Mr. Bourne.  My joke was to take you |
>>literally  = )
> | >
> | >
> | >On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:44:21 -0500 (EST)
> | >Bill E wrote:
> | >
> | >| > | Does anyone get the joke? Ha Ha Ha.
> | >| >
> | >| > That's gross!!!
> | >|
> | >| Gross? What on earth.  You know the bash shell.  its the bourn
> again | >| (BA)sh shell. It is the csh only bourn again.  The bourn
> shell, more | >| known as the c shell, was written by Charles(?) Bourne,
> Mr. Borne, I | >| don't remember his 1st name... How is that gross?
> _______________________________________________
> EuG-LUG mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug



_______________________________________________
EuG-LUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug

Reply via email to