> > > wondering if anyone else in the UG has come up with a rating
> > > system. If not, maybe there could be a little brainstorming
> > > on the topic - something reflective of EUGLUG's highly
> > > structured and serious demeaner...
> >
> > There seems not to be any real formal review ... thing ... yet, but I'm
> > using 0-10 scales in the ones I am working on.
>
> I think 0-10 may be over kill. How about 1-5.
>
> 1=Don't waste your money
> 2=Minimally adaquate
> 3=Works ok
> 4=Good to have
> 5=Can't live without it
> _______________________________________________
I vote for a 1-5 scale too - and moon pies 8^J
--
/\
[simple]-----+ \ +-----[machines]
\/
gopher://beaker.mdns.org
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
