Po Petz wrote: > Signatures for non-repudiation/non-disavowal of bad advice. > > "That iptables rule came from, uhm, a different Po..."
Yeah, I can't think of very many scenarios where it benefits the sender to send a signed, unencrypted message. The sender gets extra liability from the nonrepudiability property, and not much benefit. One such scenario is where the recipient refuses to accept or act on unsigned messages, but I haven't met anyone like that yet. -- Bob Miller K<bob> kbobsoft software consulting http://kbobsoft.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ EUGLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
