On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 03:13:02PM -0800, Steve wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 13:54, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 01:38:05PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 
> > > Further in your lengthy post, you mentioned that there aren't really any
> > > friendly tools, just a bunch of programs with a specific function that'll
> > > let you do what you want. This is how UNIX works, it's design philosophy.
> > > I always recommend to folks that, while using UNIX, they learn the UNIX
> > > way, as it's the least painful route in the long run.
> > 
> > heh, the UNIX way is RTFM.  IMO it's very sad (and extremely annoying)
> > that people complain that they have to read before doing :(
> 
> Very true. Another Unix philosophy is "There's always more than one
> right way". I guess you can't blame someone for seeing, what he feels to
> be, a better way and implementing it. Besides, even though some don't
> agree with how and why the script came to be there's probably some value
> in the exercise.

oh, for sure.  I was not trying to imply that what Horst did was foolish,
surely he must have read some documentation somewhere along the way ...
unless he just has innate python ability ;)  plus, he did fully 
describe what he was doing!

-- 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> 
> _______________________________________________
> EUGLUG mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

Reply via email to