There are hundreds of CMS tools out there.
Some of them are pretty good, and some not so good - at least not good for
the tasks one wants.

Lately, I've been using plone/zope for a document sharing site.
What I'm doing is pretty simple and I choose plone because I was
already using it for some other sites on that server, so it was 
very quick and easy in my situation.

This wouldn't have been true if I had had to start from scratch and 
I probably wouldn't have used plone.

                                          Sincerely,
                                          David Mandel
                                          Chief Activist
                                          Portland Linux/Unix Group
                                          560 SE Alexander
                                          Corvallis, Oregon 97333
                                          (541) 737-9153 at work (OSU)
                                          (541) 730-5285 cell

   ======================================================================
   David Mandel                        http://www.DavidMandel.com
   Portland Linux/Unix Group           http://pdxLinux.org
   LinuxFund                           http://LinuxFund.org
   ======================================================================


On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Working with a small group to help generate documentation and tutorials
> (including xhtml & xml docs, short flash videos, eBooks, eDocs, audiobooks,
> PDF's, etc) for various under-served open-source apps.
> 
> We are not developing any software per se (at least not yet), just
> documentation in various media formats.
> 
> Hoping some folks on this list might have experience or can provide
> recommends on available open-source CMS, LMCS or other document management
> and delivery tools?
> 
> A short list of CMS tools that was previously provided includes joomla,
> mambo, phpwcms, siteframe, xoops, and typo3. And for LMCS tools the list
> included atutor, moodle and dokeos.
> 
> In any others that should be evaluated?
> 
> We have yet to define a real set of criteria (just getting organized).
> Desired functionality includes
> check in/out repository, version and bug tracking, various file type
> support, download/upload via web, etc.
> 
> Would run on Linux vhost account (LAMP). Of course stability, reliability,
> performance, and security is important. And a good community support base.
> Ability to integrate CMS & LCMS products with other apps (forum, wiki, etc)
> would also be helpful.
> 
> Thanks for any pointers you can provide.
> 
> Darren
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EUGLUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> 
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

Reply via email to