You mean the one with bad electronics or the one with bad mech?
Both drives are non-working.

My system is so loud that it would be hard to hear anything like
this.

In any case, the BIOS fails to detect that anything is connected
when I connect any part of the drive that I am trying to recover
(bad electronics).  I don't think a frozen platter would cause
the electronics to fail to ID.
--
Allen

> Hrm... does the non-working drive make normal clicky noise when you
> hook it up?
> Im just guessing, but I think your heads may be bonded to the platters
> :D Ive seen this on my old 135MB seagate. It was pretty comical. After
> seagate replaced my drive, they didtn ask for this one back, so I took
> the cover off, and plugged it in. You could see the spindle try to turn
> and the the heads were bonded to the surface so i would kind of bounce a
> little. I used some dental tweezers to pry the heads, which was like
> braking a spot weld... it was pretty funny.
>
> Jamie
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 09:38:27PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 21:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
>> Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Damaged hard drive
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: "Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group" <[email protected]>
>> Cc: "Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group" <[email protected]>
>>
>> Alas, the operation was not successful.  In fact the good
>> electronics board flatlines when connected to my mech.
>> It doesn't even show up in the BIOS.  But when I put that
>> electronics board back on the original mech, it does show
>> up in the BIOS.
>>
>> This makes me think my theory was wrong.  It is not an
>> ESD zap.  I now think there is a short in the aux electronics
>> in the mech assembly.  That short drags down the main
>> electronics board, possibly thru the power supply.
>>
>> Unfortunately, that is a lot more difficult to repair.  It
>> would be sealed in with the platters.  I wonder how long a drive
>> would function if I opened it outside of a cleanroom.  :-)
>> --
>> Allen
>>
>> >> Alan wrote:
>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >>>> Oops!  My bad.  It's not an IBM.  Its a WD2500 Cavaliar.
>> >>>> WD2500JB-00EVA0 dated 16 Dec 2003.
>> >>>> Anybody have one of those I can trade?
>> >>>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> I might actually. Let me check tonight and get back to you.
>> >>>
>> >>> -ajb
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I actually have two of them:
>> >> sprocket:~# cat /proc/ide/hdb/model
>> >> WDC WD2500JB-00EVA0
>> >> sprocket:~# cat /proc/ide/hdc/model
>> >> WDC WD2500JB-00EVA0
>> >> sprocket:~#
>> >>
>> >> However, they are both in use right now.
>> >> If you'd really like to try them, I can probably make one available
>> to
>> >> you. Have to do some re-jiggering though.
>> >>
>> >> -ajb
>> >
>> > Thank you.  I got one from Quentin yesterday.  This one's mech is
>> > dead, making it a very appropriate victim.  I'm doing the brain
>> > transplant now, so I should very soon know if the operation was
>> > successful.  Bwah, ha, ha!
>> > --
>> > Allen
>> > Igor, raise the platform!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> EUGLUG mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> _______________________________________________
> EUGLUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
>




_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

Reply via email to