PDF is great, *if* used correctly.  There are a lot of what I'll call
"abuses" of the
format, due to its versatility -- specifically, having text in an embedded
bitmapped
graphic.  This is what you'd likely get if you scan a document into PDF
without
OCR software, or receive a PDF version of a fax transmission.

I don't like that, because it might as well be jpg or png.  It happens.  As
an archived
document, though, I find it misleading, since you cannot search the contents
(without first applying OCR), and similarly, the format used is misleading
since
I'd expect some context & content therein, but just a graphic.

I feel it is a *bit* like Flash in this way -- there are lots of wrong ways
to use a tool! :)

To answer the original question, though... it depends on what kind of
documents
you want to archive, and for what purposes you're archiving them.
Assuming textual content:
If you want them to be readable by future alien-like civilizations, use
ASCII.
If you want to preserve printable formatting, use PDF.
If you want something else, try RTF, ODT, TeX, etc.

PDF has full open-source coverage, AFAIK, unless Adobe has continued
to release new features.  PDF's are being used in the legal industry by
both courts and law firms, if that is any indication of their intended
lastingness.

regards,

ben


On 6/5/07, Hans Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Brian Gallagher wrote:

:    I am looking to archive my documents under Linux and I am
uncomfortable
:    about pdf as an open standard.  What is the consensus of this group?

Brian,

If you're looking for data points, the Internet Engineering
Task Force (ietf.org) uses PDF and ASCII.

PDF is not really that special as it is just postscript with
some extensions. Here's one author's thoughts on PDF for
scientific publishing:

  http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/publ-tips/#pdf

I would be comfortable with PDF despite it's origins as an
Adobe product which would normally make me quite nervous.

Hans
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

Reply via email to