>From what I'm seeing in the mobile market, both from devices and the
content push,
the world needs webkit on a lot of handhelds!  Our economic survival
might just rely on it.
Heh, but who's getting gubbermint grants for webkit?  ;)

Ben


On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:13 PM, marbux <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Ben Barrett <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Sounds cool, but does this smell like StarOffice & Sun, to anyone else??
>> WebKit is good, though -- just wondering whether this is really a case
>> of open source benefiting from proprietary code, or vice versa...
>
> I'm wary of it. I think there's that kind of danger any time you have
> folks answering to stockholders in the code stewardship role on an
> open source project whose code base plays the crippleware role to a
> proprietary product.
>
> OTOH, the Chromium-unique code is BSD-licensed, so no legal barriers
> to recycling the code under other licenses such as the Gnu licenses.
> But note that Chromium comes with some third party code issued under
> other licenses. <http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html#3rdparty>.
> The ones  I'm familiar with pose no barrier to recycling under other
> licenses as I recall, but there are a couple that I haven't studied.
>
> I haven't investigated the Chromium Project in depth. But my nose
> tells me to be more interested long term in what KDE does in regard to
> WebKit. They've been contributing WebKit patches and there were some
> rumbles awhile back that KDE is moving toward deprecating KHTML in
> favor of WebKit. I haven't checked to see if that's true.
>
> There's no crippleware business model and no vendor brutally
> controlling the KDE code base that I know of. :-) So I'm guessing that
> a KDE branch might be the WebKit wagon that winds up with the FOSS
> Clydesdale hitched to it. But that's only a guess. Time will tell.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Paul
>
>
> --
> Universal Interoperability Council
> <http:www.universal-interop-council.org>
> _______________________________________________
> EUGLUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
>
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

Reply via email to