I made that suggestion earlier, that as we come up with new ones we add roman numerals to the end of the name. All upgrades and such will be just noted as revision levels. We haven’t actually made one yet, so this first one would simply be known as IcePIC. The starting assembly drawing would be IcePIC rev0. Typically you change the rev level everytime anything is changed on the print, even if it is a single letter or added dimension information. This keeps people from getting two separate drawings of the same revision – which can be extremely confusing. Then at some point if we make a real major change, like use a different casing or get a hold of a nuclear battery, we go to IcePIC II rev0. Or at least that’s the general idea.

 

Robert Crawley

Elite Precision Fabricators, Inc.

Programming

(936) 449-6823

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gail Leatherwood
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:32 AM
To: Europa
Subject: Project Name

 

Since there seem to have been several "Proteus" projects, it seems like maybe Larry Klaes, et al., are right: the name "Icepick" is already "ours," so we might as well keep it. Maybe just to keep things straight we could designate the current part of the project "Icepick II" or something.

What do you think? (or does it matter--let's not get wrapped around the axle over what we call it.)

Gail (the guy) Leatherwood

 

 

 

 

Reply via email to