In a message of Thu, 21 May 2009 11:20:59 BST, John Pinner writes: >Hi, > >2009/5/21 Zeth <[email protected]>: >> I agree that a good proportion of Django fans will probably not be >> interested in a competing web framework as they have put so much >> effort into getting used to Django's unique non-standard features ;) > >yes, but what about people like me who are not committed to any one >framework and want to find out about them before making a choice?
Intro talks shouldn't be scheduled against each other. And, if wanted, we can decide to not schedule them against any wf talks. But it is still important to schedule the Django ones all together, and the TG ones likewise, etc. Consider that while you are at your WF talks, you will be missing talks on testing, databases, or whatever else floats your boat. These things will be scheduled in such a way that the talks logically flow one from other, especially where there are 2 or more talks on the same sort of stuff. So it is bad if you keep having to miss talk 2 out of a series of 3 because that's where the Django talks are, and you hopping around like a frog ín a fire makes it harder on the others who are staying put. The idea is not to schedule for people who want variety -- they will always be trouble :) no matter what you do -- but for the people who do not. Otherwise every talk loses 5-7 minutes 'while we wait for the people who are leaving to get out of here, and the people who just arrived to sit down and be quiet'. Laura _______________________________________________ Europython-improve mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython-improve
