In a message of Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:48:51 +0200, "Massa, Harald Armin" writes: >>> >>> Good idea. Â Do you want to make the first stab at prioritising? > >Yes. I stab. And after trying... >> >> I think the most important missing information regarding a possible >> decision is the budget plan for Italian proposal. >> >the priorization led to the same result: a budget for italy, and the >similiar conclusion concerning > >> The German one basically only appears to work if there are >> two major sponsors for dinner and lunch. Otherwise, they'd >> have to raise the delegate fees by EUR 75 [corrected, ham] and would th >en be >> closer to the Italian proposal. > > >All the other questions fell either around various formulations of the >budget or are not really needed for the decision. > >I suggest for Germany and Italy to recheck their proposals for those >budget-related questions and then to start the decision process. So >only the 2011/2012 winner will have to find the answers now, the other >party is on duty for 2013/2014 :) > >Harald
In cause this is unclear ... I'm not reserving EP for 4 years in advance at this time; it would be unfair to those I know who are interested in hosting in 2013/2014 but who don't have a proposal in now. Laura _______________________________________________ Europython-improve mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython-improve
