On Monday 17 May 2010 14:08:01 Alex Willmer wrote: > > Given these numbers, I've attached a mock up schedule (odf and pdf). > The placement of talks is arbitrary and impossible, ignore those. How > does the length of each day, and the timings of the slots look?
I was concerned that we'd have enough talks, but it looks like a pretty full schedule. As for the timings, from the spreadsheet it looks like the timing is as follows: Monday, Tuesday: a formal start at 9am, lunch at 12:30pm Wednesday, Thursday: start at 8:30am, lunch at noon On all days: talks are grouped into 1.5 hour "double slots" except after lunch, where it's actually a plenary and then two talks, making it 2.5 hours I can't see anything unreasonable about this, really. As I noted, it's a full schedule, and I guess there's a chance of informal breaks in order to split up that 2.5 hours if it's seen as being a bit long. Paul P.S. I guess that Open Space occurs in some other room, parallel to the four tracks in the schedule, and that it's "New and Improved <something>" and not necessarily "New and Improved Michael Foord". ;-) _______________________________________________ Europython-improve mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython-improve
