uh, this discussion, IMNSHO, is rapidly becoming non-interesting. And I am a bit upset at seeing the same discussion popup again and again.
So, can we please just decide on what software to use? I am not interested in, at least as I perceive it, this covert blame-game that is currently going on. What happened, happende, let's not let it happen again. The problems we had we had were had for specific reasons - most of them had nothing to do with the technology. Bottom line: is the software ready or not? We need NOT to integrate the website with INFORMATION on the conference with any other conference reg.system, automated or manual. I've managed larger conferences that EPC without any automated systems. ust a website with info (edicted with a texteditor). So, how much time do folks that have interests in EPC using their software need to set up working environments so that the rest of us can evaluate? Perhaps there are more people than just Strakt and CERN interested in having their software evaluated? We need to have a decision on this soon. And please - let's keep the requirements at a sensible and practical level. Is 10 days enough time for the interested parties to set their systems up? /dario -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Lopez-Kästen, IT Systems & Services Chalmers University of Tech. Lyrics applied to programming & application design: "emancipate yourself from mental slavery" - redemption song, b. marley _______________________________________________ EuroPython mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython
