"Nicolas Pettiaux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2007/1/10, Michael Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I don't think it's so much the specific tracks that need work at this
>> stage, but rather more conference-wide things. I think it would be
>> good to try to have a timetable for issuing call for papers, and so
>> on.
>
> OK let's start with that, for example in the wiki
Makes sense I guess. We can carve out a bit of the python.org wiki
again I guess.
>> Some kind of widely-spread announcement about EuroPython would be good
>> to have fairly soon, I think.
>
> modelled on the one of last year.
>
> But if we do this, wouldn't it be wise to have the welcome page of the
> EP website adapted to the future ?
It is, at least to some extent, isn't it? I guess the local
information and such should be updated.
>> > Could someone help with the archiving of the site of previous year,
>> > while ensuring that they remain fully searchable and usable as
>> > reference, to show everyone how active the previous conferences were ?
>> >
>> > What about having our own, if needed, site to deal with the
>> > registration of the papers ?
>>
>> We have talked about installing Indico (the software we used last
>> time) to do this. I could probably install it on the
>> starship.python.net machine.
>
> good. Thanks,
Something for the todo pile then. I hope I'll get to this next week.
>> > On which machine could this run ? Who could help with its setup and
>> > maintenance ?
>>
>> We had a promise from the CERN people to help with our installation, I
>> think.
>
> yes, they did explicitely if I remember well.
I hope they remember :-)
Cheers,
mwh
--
Any form of evilness that can be detected without *too* much effort
is worth it... I have no idea what kind of evil we're looking for
here or how to detect is, so I can't answer yes or no.
-- Guido Van Rossum, python-dev
_______________________________________________
EuroPython mailing list
EuroPython@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython
