I just got approved as a proposal reviewer and had a look at the list of proposals awaiting review. I noticed two things:
- I can't see the contents of the "Notes" field in the submission form for proposals listed anywhere. Since this was advertised especially as an opportunity to pass explanatory remarks to the reviewers, this omission is very unfortunate. - I'm fairly certain that in the form to submit training proposals the first two text areas were labelled "Structure" and "Description" instead of "Abstract" and "Description" and they were in reverse order. The result is that training proposals now contain a narrative of the structure in the abstract field, where reviewers would probably would expect a short description of (the topics of) the training, seeing that the section is labelled "Abstract" and is listed first. Can we please make the contents of the "Notes" field visible to the reviewers? Can we label the sections in the reviewer view the same as they were labelled in the submission form? Can we make sure that for trainings the right text ends up in the conference program (i.e. the contents of the "Description" field)? Chris _______________________________________________ EuroPython 2014 Berlin, 21th27th July EuroPython mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython
