Need a four passenger vehicle.  What would work.  For not much more money?
Lawrence Rhodes...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Victor Tikhonov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:57 PM
Subject: IN-1 (Insight clone of EV-1) kit thought (was: build proposed...


> I'd like listers opinion:
>
> If Insight as perfect EV oriented glider is getting so popular
> especially as EV-1 replacement, would there a high tech
> components kit ("just add the batteries") be popular?
>
> Im thinking of the finest components I'm able to put together
> while fit for Insight, as a turn-key kit (except batteries
> and BMS):
>
> - AC inverter - Siemens Simovert 6SV1 preprogrammed
> - Charger - Brusa NLG5xx preprogrammed, NiCd kit (softw.) optional
> - Ah meter - Brusa BCM220
>  (All above hardware networked and talks via CAN)
> - AC motor - Siemens 1PV5105WS12
> - Water pump - Jabsco 59500-0012
> - Vacuum pump - MES 70/6E
> - Adapter plate - fits Insight
> - Shaft coupler for clutchless operation.
>
> Any other suggestions at this point?
>
> All the components are around $15k to $20k depending
> on some options (like 3...10kW charger).
>
> With $10k Insight glider you get $25k to $30k EV-1 clone,
> in some respects even better. Not cheap, but you get what
> you paid for.
>
> How much would you pay for EV-1?
> Is all above worth the effort?
>
> Victor
>
>
>
> Martin Jackson wrote:
> >
> >   A more philosophical posting on the Insight EV. First, it's a good
> >   second car all by itself. GC batteries would be very out of place but
> >   Optimas would be a fair compromise. And the use of a sep-ex system in
> >   one would make for an interesting, valid comparison of the available
> >   regen systems.
> >
> >   The EV-1 customer would the ideal person for this as the Insight is a
> >   technological bargain to start with. This isn't a dragster, but it
> >   isn't an economy cruiser either, it's an EV-1 you can keep. Where the
> >   EV-1 might have a plus factor, consider that you can't have it anyway.
> >   ______________________________________________________________________
>

Reply via email to