Well, it's spring again in New England, which means I have the 914 back on the 
road, freshly upgraded with a Z1K, an Elcon DC/DC, and several tweaks.  I've 
started experimenting with different driving techniques and made a few 
surprising discoveries.

The first is that my car actually seems to be more efficient when I'm lazy and 
leave it in 3rd gear all the time!  This is rather the opposite of what I'd 
expect given I^2R losses and the efficiency curves of the motor (ADC 9").  
However, I've noticed my tranny getting quite hot after a long drive, and I 
suspect its losses at high RPM are enough to reverse any gains from running the 
motor more efficiently.  Now, I could probably get the best of both worlds 
using 2nd gear for more efficient starts and 3rd for cruising, but who's 
counting?

Second is that brush timing seems to have more of an effect on torque than I 
realized.  When I was starting in 2nd gear all the time, the car was off the 
line so fast I never noticed any subtleties in acceleration.  However, driving 
around in 3rd, I notice the car feeling sluggish starting out even at 1000A, 
but I can feel the acceleration pick up as my speed increases.  It goes from 
ho-hum to pushed back harder and harder into my seat.  I also never experienced 
this as much because the ol' T-rex did a throttle-to-volts control whereas the 
Zilla does throttle-to-amps, so I can see from the needle that I "should" be 
getting constant torque based on T=kI^2.  I suspect this is because my motor 
has advanced brush timing; I just never expected the effect to be so 
noticeable!  Makes me wish I had an AC or BLDC motor where I could adjust the 
timing electronically...

Third (not so surprising really) is that there's a definite variation in cell 
performance depending on where they're located in the car.  I have batteries 
distributed in 3 areas:  the front trunk where the gas tank used to live, the 
engine compartment lower rack (quite exposed), and the engine compartment upper 
rack (less exposed).  My BMS streams data via bluetooth, so I was able to log 
cell voltages on my way home today.  It was a reasonably warm, sunny day, but 
dropped to 40 by the time I left work, around 8:00.  Looking at my telemetry, 
there's a definite trend in performance:  the cells in the front trunk were 
noticeably higher voltage and lower ESR than the bottom rack engine 
compartment.  The top rack engine compartment were in between.  There's even a 
trend within the bottom bank, where the ones most exposed to airflow were the 
weakest.  The pack is quite well balanced, so this is clearly due to 
temperature.  It will be interesting to see how it affects the aging of t
 he pack, and which age faster:  the high-resistance cells that are being 
driven closer to their limit, or the lower resistance cells that are being 
degraded faster by high temperature.

Anyway, thought I'd share.  It's been a little too quiet around the list 
lately...

Cheers
-Ben
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to