Tesla seems to realize that too.  You can adjust the end charge point.  For 
daily use, they recommend a range that looks like it is about 50-80%.

On March 28, 2015 3:39:15 PM MDT, Michael Ross via EV <[email protected]> wrote:
>Yes.  That is pretty much what the best scientists working on it say.
>Keeping it from getting too hot (which may not be all that hot, and I
>have
>not read anything that tells what temperature or other thermal history
>is
>implicated) when fully charged should eliminate the degradation caused
>by
>the reactive, delithiated positive electrode from tearing up the
>electrolyte.
>
>You CAN control how much of a charge you put on it, and you CAN simply
>make
>sure you run some of the charge off right away.  This is bound to
>improve
>matters.  $10k and a some Leaf cells and you might get a study done to
>sort
>it out better.  Rank speculation: NIssan probably won't fund it, or
>reveal
>if that have - they simple made the problem go away by some needed
>modifications to the pack.
>
>There are other potential problems, but this is what has messed up the
>Leafs in places like AZ according to Jeff Dahn.
>
>On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Cor van de Water via EV
><[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> So - in a sense the availability of QC could improve the Leaf's pack
>life
>> if you only charge to 80-ish percent SoC and rely more on QC to
>complete
>> the trips that you otherwise would have needed a full charge for?
>>
>> Cor van de Water
>> Chief Scientist
>> Proxim Wireless Corporation http://www.proxim.com
>> Email: [email protected]    Private: http://www.cvandewater.info
>> Skype: cor_van_de_water     XoIP: +31877841130
>> Tel: +1 408 383 7626        Tel: +91 (040)23117400 x203
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: EV on behalf of Michael Ross via EV
>> Sent: Sat 3/28/2015 10:53 AM
>> To: David Rees; Electric Vehicle Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: [EVDL] EVLN: LEAF EV Pack Reliability Outperforms Cynics
>&
>> Critics (?)
>>
>> Yes, the rate of charge is not a problem, it is being fully charged
>AND too
>> hot.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxP0Cu00sZs
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 2:06 AM, David Rees via EV
><[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Paul Dove via EV
><[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Well that just verifies what I said. You have no data other than
>coming
>> > from
>> > > the Leaf instruments. If it calculates capacity incorrectly it
>will
>> shut
>> > down the car.
>> > > You still don't know if the battery failed or the capacity
>measurement
>> > is off.
>> > > One would have to measure voltage and amp hours to really know
>what is
>> > happening
>> >
>> > It's pretty easy to verify pack voltage using LeafSpy or LeafDD or
>> > similar tools. I've verified that my LEAF is down close to 25%
>after
>> > almost 4 years and almost 40k miles in southern California.
>> >
>> > That said, the INL (Idaho National Laboratory) tested four 2012
>LEAFs
>> > in Arizona over a period of about 2 years and 50,000 miles - two
>were
>> > only charged on L2, the other two were only charged using DC QC.
>> >
>> > http://avt.inl.gov/fsev.shtml
>> > http://avt.inl.gov/pdf/energystorage/DCFC_Study_FactSheet_50k.pdf
>> >
>> > Battery capacity was verified by pulling the packs and measuring
>> > capacity using a defined test protocol.
>> >
>> > While the DC QC cars fared slightly worse, at the end of 50k miles
>the
>> > L2 charged cars had lost almost 25% of their capacity and the QCed
>> > cars lost about 27% of their capacity.
>> >
>> > So yeah - the 2011-2012 LEAFs definitely lose capacity fast,
>> > especially in hot climates. The good news is that frequent QC
>doesn't
>> > appear to significantly change your rate of capacity loss unless
>you
>> > use QC nearly exclusively.
>> >
>> > -Dave
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> > http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>> > For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
>> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk.
>> Thomas A. Edison
>> <http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/t/thomasaed125362.html>
>>
>> A public-opinion poll is no substitute for thought.
>> *Warren Buffet*
>>
>> Michael E. Ross
>> (919) 585-6737 Land
>> (919) 576-0824 <https://www.google.com/voice/b/0?pli=1#phones> Google
>> Phone
>> (919) 631-1451 Cell
>>
>> [email protected]
>> <[email protected]>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>>
>http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150328/6b95d1a1/attachment.htm
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>> For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: not available
>> Type: application/ms-tnef
>> Size: 5231 bytes
>> Desc: not available
>> URL: <
>>
>http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150328/65acdebd/attachment.bin
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>> For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>>
>>

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to