On 9 Oct 2015 at 0:17, brucedp5 via EV wrote: > A recent study by some economists determined that EVs, rather than getting tax > breaks, should be taxed at higher rates in the coal-dependent East and Midwest > for the indirect air pollution they cause.
I have some suspicions about who's paying those economists' salaries. :-( You can "prove" whatever your paymaster wants, just by making the appropriate assumptions and calculating from there. This reminds me of the bought-and-paid-for studies that "proved" that the EV1's lead batteries were worse for the environment than an ICEV (providing that none of them was ever recycled), or the ones that "proved" much the same argument about Prius batteries. David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA EVDL Administrator = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = EVDL Information: http://www.evdl.org/help/ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Note: mail sent to "evpost" and "etpost" addresses will not reach me. To send a private message, please obtain my email address from the webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ . = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = _______________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/ Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
