https://thenewswheel.com/california-utilities-getting-in-on-ev-chargers-and-why-you-should-care/
California Utilities Getting in on EV Chargers, And Why You Should Care
August 26, 2016  

[image  
https://thenewswheel.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/GM-Solar-Arrays-1024x680.jpg
(3 Volt pih pulling on EVSE)  GM Solar Arrays
]

When it comes to electric vehicles and emissions policy, much of the country
looks to California to lead the way and set precedents. This makes decisions
like the one currently coming up for debate in California much more
important than just a local concern.

California’s largest utility, Pacific Gas & Electric Co., has proposed a
plan to build up to 7,600 EV charging points at a cost of $160 million—the
largest single deployment of plug-in infrastructure in the country. PG&E
would be relying on the ratepayers to finance the project.

This would serve a number of functions—first, increased infrastructure would
also increase the attractiveness of electric vehicles (since availability of
charging stations has long been a problem with EVs), which comes from a
requirement from the California Public Utilities Commission that has
utilities create plans to increase EV usage.

Beyond that, involvement of a public utility would produce much larger
volumes of chargers which otherwise are prohibitively expensive to build and
operate for third parties, the extra energy usage would help absorb the
excess renewable energy generated each day, and money going back to a public
utility would lower electricity rates. Finally, the charge station placement
would encourage those who don’t own houses to buy EVs, since PG&E would
prioritize placements at workplaces and multifamily housing.

On the other hand, there are groups that have problems with the plan. Two
consumer groups voiced concerns that the plan was too large and cost too
much, while voicing doubts that it would actually encourage EV adoption.
Instead, they offered an alternate, much smaller proposal, which would build
2,500 Level 2 chargers (240V chargers) and 10 DC fast chargers, to cost less
than $87.4 million. The original proposal called for 7,500 Level 2 charging
ports and 100 DC chargers.

The cost per ratepayer for the original plan would be a rise of $2.64 in the
first year, an amount which is estimated to drop afterward. Opponents of the
plan, like Mindy Spatt of consumer group The Utility Reform Network, said
that “it’s not the only thing a customer is going to see added on their
bill. PG&E is continually justifying rate hikes by saying it’s just a dollar
or two, but it all adds up.”

The decision ultimately falls to the California Public Utilities Commission,
who could accept the plan, reject it entirely, or pick up one of the
dissenting parties’ proposals. Whichever way it decides, the choice will
certainly affect similar decisions across the nation.
[© thenewswheel.com]

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/california-utility-wants-to-install-huge-number-of-electric-car-chargers/
California Utility Wants to Install Huge Number of Electric Car ...
August 26, 2016  Supporters argue a shift is needed in the marketplace to
get needed charging stations and attract more EV buyers, as the Golden
States aims to cut the ...




For EVLN EV-newswire posts use: 
http://evdl.org/evln/


{brucedp.0catch.com}

--
View this message in context: 
http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/Utilities-Getting-in-on-EVSE-And-Why-You-Should-Care-tp4683568.html
Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to