Was stunned to read the drivel that appeared on Yahoo News today. Clearly
author under influence of Koch. Choice cuts:
"No reason to drive an EV"
"Combustion vehicle range of 500-600 mi."
There's bias, then there's REALLY bad, over-the-top bias. This was the latter.
Bob Bath, from his iPod, so any misspellings are from autocorrect or fat
fingers on a small device, not cluelessness...
> On Oct 21, 2017, at 9:42 AM, Lee Hart via EV <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Paul Compton via EV wrote:
>> Drag factor is a load of crap.
>> It's drag in terms of force required to propel a vehicle at a given
>> speed that's important.
>> The drag factor is derived from that force and a reference area.
>> Inconsistencies in the way that area is calculated for road vehicles,
>> makes drag factor mostly a marketing figure.
> I agree. CD is a useful metric from a designer's point of view. Design
> engineers will define precisely how they are measuring drag, and then test
> various models under identical conditions to find out what helps, and what
> hinders. They are likely to use small scale models, in a wind tunnel. The
> models don't move, and their wheels aren't turning; the air is blown over
> them. The models often aren't "finished"; they have no lights, rear view
> mirrors, door seams, the bottom is smooth, etc. The results are relative; but
> don't apply all that well to the finished car.
> Unfortunately, it gets twisted by marketing, and used for advertising
> purposes. They'll take the CD for the best model, and pretend it applies to
> the real car. Or simply make it up, to be a notch better than whatever the
> competition just claimed.
> As to the original question: "Why do electric vehicles have to look so ugly"?
> Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and constantly changes depending on
> fashion. Just look at what were considered to be "beautiful" cars over the
> years! Some that were once considered gorgeous now look hideous!
> Given the present state of the art, EVs do not have "power to waste" like
> ICEs. EVs *have* to be designed more efficiently. That forces the stylists to
> give at least some say to the engineers. EVs look the way they do because
> they *work better* that way. In its own way, that is beautiful, too.
> We ascribe beauty to that which is simple, with no superfluous parts;
> which exactly answers its end; which stands related to all things, and
> is the mean of many extremes. (Ralph Waldo Emerson)
> When I am working on a problem, I never think about beauty. But when
> I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong.
> (Buckminster Fuller)
> Lee Hart, 814 8th Ave N, Sartell MN 56377, www.sunrise-ev.com
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)