Are you asking me? I'm sorry but I don't understand why you are asking the question. Personally, I don't think an ICE is better, environmentally, than an EV.


------ Original Message ------
From: "Mark Abramowitz" <>
To: "Peri Hartman" <>; "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <>
Sent: 26-Oct-17 8:49:14 AM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] EVLN: (ice) Experts say there's no need for a 750mi EV-range sweet spot

Why would a polluting ICE be better than a ZEV?

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 26, 2017, at 6:33 AM, Peri Hartman via EV <> wrote:

Yep. 240, or maybe 300, miles range is sufficient for road trips. At least for me. But charge time has to be quicker. At least 100kW? That's still 40-50 minutes for an 80% charge. For now, I can rent an ICE on those occasions. But then we still need ICEs.


------ Original Message ------
From: "brucedp5 via EV" <>
Cc: "brucedp5" <>
Sent: 25-Oct-17 10:14:59 PM
Subject: [EVDL] EVLN: (ice) Experts say there's no need for a 750mi EV-range sweet spot

% These were the same ice-bozos that said there is no need for more than 50 miles, nor 100 mile, nor 200+ mile range ... but the public is only thinking what those same ice experts have told them: more range is better, thus more
range sells. %
746 miles on a charge? Experts say there?fs no need
Oct 22, 2017  Eric D. Lawrence / Detroit Free Press

(bolt) Industry watchers and auto executives are tapping the brakes on the idea that the future of mainstream electric vehicles will be tied to an ever-expanding range. Some now say they believe the sweet spot for battery
range might already have been reached

DETROIT ?\ Elon Musk predicted two years ago that a Tesla should be able

Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (

Reply via email to