I have 48 CALB CA100's in my truck, also 5 years old. I've never even had to top off any. I checked them in the Spring and they were all within 2 thousandths of a volt of each other. In July I had one of those *doh* events and drained the *entire* pack to 9 volts. I recharged the pack and they were all within 2 thousandths of a volt of each other...except for 1 which read 0 volts. I had a spare which I charged externally to the same voltage as those in the pack. Two charge cycles and I checked again this weekend. All the same still. So I'm with Tom. CALBs are magic.

--Rick


On 8/7/2018 6:48 PM, Tom Jones via EV wrote:
I really have to beg to differ about CALBs.
My Focus has 45 CA180 cells that have been on the road for about five years without BMS. Once a year, sometimes twice, I pump a few amp hours into the lowest cells with with a radio control type charger.
That usually involves about five cells.
I do have a homemade battery monitor with a display, expanded voltage scale, that I use to keep a eye on the pack while driving. And, I do datalog each cell all the time while driving and charging. In the charging sweet spot, about 3.4 volts, all 45 cells are in a tight range of about 25 mV. I consider that basically magic! My battery monitor also will stop the J1772 if any single cell voltage gets too high.
So, that my experience with CALB cells,

Tom



On 8/6/2018 7:51 PM, Alan Arrison via EV wrote:
I guarantee that the inferior Chinese cells will change capacity as they are cycled and not by just a few percent.

Running them without a BMS is a recipe for disaster. Damaged cells at best, a fire at worst.

All the Chinese cells are junk, especially the CALBS.

Al

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20180808/4dc2f357/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to