https://cleantechnica.com/2018/09/29/nissans-long-strange-trip-with-leaf-batteries/
Nissan’s Long Strange Trip With LEAF Batteries
September 29th, 2018  Maarten Vinkhuyzen

[images  
https://cleantechnica.com/files/2018/09/426224168_The_new_Nissan_LEAF.jpg
2018 Nissan LEAF 40kWh

https://cleantechnica.com/files/2018/09/Nissan-Leaf-battery-degradation.jpg
Yikes

https://cleantechnica.com/files/2018/09/Nissan-Leaf-battery-degradation-2.jpg
]

The Nissan LEAF is infamous for its battery problems. It started with the
fast degrading 24kWh battery in the original 2010 Nissan LEAF. That battery
was not up to the hot conditions of US Southwest states. It was replaced by
a battery with a different chemistry, the 24kWh “lizard battery” in 2014. In
2015, the model year 2016 (MY2016) LEAF got a slightly larger 30kWh battery
option. In the MY2018 Nissan LEAF, an even bigger 40kWh battery was offered.

When Nissan decided to build the Leaf, it discovered a little problem. The
battery production capacity it needed did not exist, and the battery makers
were not willing to invest the billions of dollars needed to expand
production. Nissan intended to start production with 50,000 cars per year,
growing to 300,000–500,000 in about 5 years. Batteries were crazy expensive
in those days. From $400kWh for the cheapest laptop batteries to over
$1,000kWh for high-quality batteries good enough for use in EVs.

The only option for Nissan was to start producing its own batteries. Up
until now, all Nissan batteries have been made by AESC, the joint venture
Nissan and NEC started in 2010 to make electric vehicle batteries.

To reduce costs, Nissan originally opted for a small (24kWh) battery without
a thermal management system (TMS). When the heat in some places caused rapid
degradation because it was too much for this battery, Nissan chose a better
chemistry instead of adding a TMS, expecting that it would be good enough
and a lot cheaper. A TMS would require an extensive redesign of the battery
pack and the surrounding area in the car.

While this new lizard battery was still having faster degradation than other
car batteries in the semi-deserts of Texas and Arizona, in most of the rest
of the world, the problem was gone. This did not stop purists from demanding
the only real solution, a great TMS, but the number of warranty claims told
Nissan that the problems were over.

That is, until the new 30kWh battery in the MY2016 LEAF started to show the
same problems as the original LEAF battery, but only worse this time. The
rapid degradation of the battery is shown in an extensive statistical
analysis by New Zealand EV user collective “Flip the Fleet” from March 2018.
These findings confirmed the experience of many LEAF drivers, who had seen
the maximum range of their cars rapidly decline and were met with disbelief
by Nissan.

Yikes.

To say that the Nissan response has been lackluster is way too friendly. It
has taken three years for Nissan to acknowledge that the problem existed and
come with an explanation and solution. The explanation is that the software
computing the charge of the battery contained a bug, reporting less capacity
than there really was (resulting in less range) and reporting a depleted
battery before it was empty.

Nissan does not have over-the-air updates like Tesla. That means you have to
visit a Nissan dealer to get the patch applied. After the software upgrade,
the 30kWh battery is as good as its 24kWh sister, as good as you can expect
of a battery without a TMS.

The battery capacity is automagically restored to the level it really has
and the range calculation is better than it was.

These LEAF batteries are adequate for temperate zones like Western Europe,
Japan, and some parts of the USA, like New England, but they are not fit for
regions with extreme heat or cold and the lack of a TMS makes road trips
with repeated fast charging hard to do in any climate. The only way is
leisurely wandering from charger to charger. Perfect for some types of
holidays, but when you want to reach a destination, let alone a cannonball
run from coast to coast, this is not the battery you want.

The long overdue new battery from LG Chem is supposed to have a TMS. But the
waiting time for that larger battery keeps increasing. Now that the sale of
AESC to a Chinese investor has been canceled and NEC is replaced by Envision
as a partner in AESC, with Nissan keeping a 25% stake, we can expect AESC to
stay on as the battery supplier for the Nissan LEAF and future Nissan
electric vehicles. Knowing what we know now about batteries, it is time for
AESC to develop a battery with a good thermal management system.
[© cleantechnica.com]


+
https://insideevs.com/emotorwerks-juicenet-30-mw-virtual-battery/
eMotorWerks JuiceNet Used As 30 MW “Virtual Battery”
SEP 28 2018  The Enel subsidiary eMotorWerks is using its electric vehicle
chargers to participate ... predictions on how electric vehicle adoption was
going to crash the grid!
https://insideevs.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2018-09-27-898x507.png




For EVLN EV-newswire posts use:
 http://evdl.org/archive/


{brucedp.neocities.org}

--
Sent from: http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to