On 5 May 2019 at 17:04, Lee Hart via EV wrote:

> I don't think the situation is hopeless or impossible. But it is 
> certainly difficult.
> It's the Innovator's Dilemma. How do you sell a disruptive new product 
> in a market already controlled by entrenched competitors? Answer? You 
> can't. You have to find, or create a new market, and fly under their 
> "rader" until you can get big enough to compete. Like Apple vs. IBM, or 
> Amazon vs. Sears.

The problem is that most products that claim to be "disruptive" aren't. 
(Hello, Juicero!)  "Disruptive" has become just another advertising 
buzzword, as bogus as any of them, except that it seems to be more useful in 
advertising to investors than to consumers.

IMO the main thing (besides lousy battery management) that held up EVs for 
decades is that very few vehicle buyers cared about the problems they 
solved.  The vast majority of auto buyers don't give a honking hoot about 
their vehicles' emissions.  

In solving problems that vehicle buyers didn't care about, EV makers created 
problems that vehicle buyers DID care about -- range less than a tank of 
gas's, charging time longer than refueling an ICEV, and high purchase price.

(Also, until relatively recently, BIG battery headaches.  It used to be that 
just about every used-EV-for-sale ad said "needs new batteries.")

The nations where EVs have had some success have passed laws to create 
problems that EVs could solve.  Some examples of these are carpool lane 
access, city congestion charges and exclusion days, high taxes on gasoline 
and Diesel fuel, and high purchase and ownership taxes on ICEVs.  

They also paid people to buy EVs with direct and indirect subsidies.  

Wonder of wonders, just as EV proponents predicted 30 years ago, when 
actually carried out aggressively and consistently, legislative EV promotion 
worked.  (See: Norway.)

BTW, don't misunderstand me: I'm not opposed to those incentives!

All that said, I can think of one EV manufacturer that's chosen to deal with 
a few issues that DO somewhat matter to vehicle buyers, issues not 
engendered by legislation.  Those issues include showroom purchase 
experience, service department experience, and vehicle obsolescence.  They 
may have tackled a few others that I don't know about because I'm not 
personallly involved with the company or their cars.  

To solve those problems, they're approaching the business of selling and 
maintaining vehicles in ways that automakers just don't do -- or at least 
mostly didn't, until now.  

Now that, to me, is disruption.  YMMV.

It's Tesla, and what I think is interesting is that they could probably have 
been equally disruptive building ICEVs.  In fact, they'd probably be making 
a healthy profit right now if they had.  I don't know about you, but I"m 
glad that they disrupted Detroit's fat, torpid, it's-always-worked-this-way 
slumber while making EVs.

David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA
EVDL Administrator

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
EVDL Information: http://www.evdl.org/help/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
Note: mail sent to "evpost" and "etpost" addresses will not 
reach me.  To send a private message, please obtain my 
email address from the webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ .
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to