On 11/30/19 5:49 PM, Lawrence Rhodes via EV wrote:
Hydrogen is a distraction from battery electric vehicles. They are half as efficient. The fuelling stations are costly. The fuel is more expensive and a fossil fuel. When you have Tesla with a national refueling system which BTW has been paid for already why are hydrogen vehicles needed? Tesla's are less costly to purchase than the FCV currently available. All hydrogen vehicles should be banned, converted to batteries or destroyed like the EV1 so taxpayers don't have to pay for the hydrogen boondoggle. Lawrence Rhodes
Well put, Lawrence! Tesla puts other charge networks in the shade with almost no prospect of others catching up. Done, AFAIK, with no subsidy. All the while offering to share the network with others. With no takers.
On this list, it sometimes seems Tesla does not get the love they deserve. _______________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/index.html INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
