Hi Dave etc,

 

Well said but it make perfect sense to promote fool cells if you're a large
oily company with a liquid gas station refooling (gas pump) business model -
not really concerned about efficiency.

 

 

 

Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 07:23:10 -0500

From: "EVDL Administrator" <[email protected]>

To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: [EVDL]  California?s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program

Message-ID: <[email protected]>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

 

I'm hesitant to say anything in this thread because many years ago the EVDL
voted to downplay hydrogen, despite the fact that it's mentioned in our 

original charter.   

 

Also, a lot of what I say won't register for the True Believers.  They'll
dismiss it out of hand.  Nobody can shake their convictions.  There's not
much  I can do about that.  

 

But I think something needs to be said.  BEVs have made huge strides in the
last 20 years, while progress for FCEVs has been slower.  

 

Even when FCEVs run on hydrogen-stored electrictiy from renewable sources,
BEVs use the same electricity more efficiently. That's easily documented.  

More steps from electricity source to motor, more losses.  Simple physics.

 

And then there's infrastructure.  BEVs have a commanding and probably
unassailable lead.  Tesla has 1,636 supercharger stations in North America,
and that doesn't even count the non-Tesla EVSEs.  

 

By comparison, fueling infrastructure for FCEVs is pitiful: just 38
stations, all in California.  Good luck driving your FCEV coast to coast.

 

Yep, FCEVs can be fueled faster, but not by much any more.  DC charging is
now reaching 350kW.  That can fill a big-battery Tesla S to 80% in less than

14 minutes.  

 

Sure, we could make FCEVs more practical by throwing hundreds of billions of
dollars at renewable energy H2 production and refueling infrastructure.  

 

The question is, why should we do that when BEVs are viable and affordable
NOW, are already contributing to cleaner air and lower carbon emissions, and


are simpler and more efficient than FCEVs?   

 

Seriously, what do FCEVs really offer that's better than what BEVs are
already giving us?  What exactly justifies taking resources away from BEVs
and giving them to FCEVs?  

 

David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA

EVDL Administrator

 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = EVDL Information:
http://www.evdl.org/help/ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = =

Note: mail sent to "evpost" and "etpost" addresses will not reach me.  To
send a private message, please obtain my email address from the webpage
http://www.evdl.org/help/ .

 

 

Have a renewable energy day,

 

Mark

 

Mark E. Hanson

184 Vista Lane

Fincastle, VA 24090

540-473-1248 phone & FAX, 540-816-0812 cell

REEVA: community service RE & EV project club

Website: www.REEVAdiy.org (See Project Gallery)

UL Certified PV Installer

My RE&EV Circuits: www.EVDL.org/lib/mh 

REEVA Demo:  <http://youtu.be/4kqWn2H-rA0> http://youtu.be/4kqWn2H-rA0 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20191203/2f26dab0/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/index.html
INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to