As a former newspaper brat, I'll just say that this falls far short of what's needed to prove product libel, so there's no legal standing.
Also, IMHO, this makes Austin look a whole lot worse than Plone. It looks like a place where the web techs need government assistance. On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Matt Hamilton <[email protected]>wrote: > Mark, > What is the best way of us handling this? That article makes some harsh > comments about Plone. If Plone were some large corporate I would imagine > that lawyers would be swinging into action now. > > Do we want to publish some kind of official statement in response? Or > privately contact that newspaper and ask them to retract their comment. It > is a quote though so I don't know legal standing. Or do we just keep our > head down and not draw attention to it? > > > http://www.statesman.com/news/texas/local-firm-to-start-city-web-site-redesign-129437.html > > -Matt > > > > _______________________________________________ > Evangelism mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/evangelism >
_______________________________________________ Evangelism mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/evangelism
