On 2016-10-24 08:22, Axel Braun wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 23. Oktober 2016, 22:49:26 schrieb Felix Miata:
>>> Me, I think something else would be easier, perhaps ubuntu.
>>
>> Ubuntu *is* (a) Debian (derivative), just with a custom set of personality 
>> modifications designed for shielding its users from the underlying power of 
>> FOSS, e.g. Unity (aka only one way), and sudo (Ugh!).
> 
> As long as you just use it from the CLI, it should be OK. Using Ubuntu with 
> Unity is clearly a no-go in terms of privacy.

Well, a server is mostly used as services and via CLI for changing
configurations.

> But using TW from command line and not running behind each and every update 
> may be OK for a server as well. Depends on the needs.

Security wise, kernel and services that connect to internet, I guess.

The machine has a pentium processor, so anything intensive takes ages.

-- 
Cheers / Saludos,

                Carlos E. R.
                (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Evergreen mailing list
Evergreen@lists.rosenauer.org
http://lists.rosenauer.org/mailman/listinfo/evergreen

Reply via email to