Others will have to speak for themselves, but for my part I give reasons why
I consider that an AUH (ie more-or-less a plenitude) is the only
substantially reasonable explanation for our world in
and subsequent links. I don't mind discussing other possible reasonable
approaches (and have often done so), but most of these are of course
'off-topic' as far as this list is concerned.
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott D. Yelich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 11 May 2000 09:29
Subject: Proof/insistance of multiverse/plenitude?
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> First, let me state that I am not a scientist that deals
> with this stuff -- so please forgive me if I seem
> naive or non-technical... but I have a question:
> Why are some people so adament about a "plenitude" or
> a "multiverse" ... what proof is there that is so
> convincing that the defenders of this faith are
> unwilling to discuss anything else?
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----