> > Hi Worlder, > > I continue to read the mails but I'm really overwhelmed to > participate actively. > > Nevertheless I want you to know I've realised that OCCAM razor > is not enough to eliminate completely the use of the > movie graph argument (or Maudlin's Olympia) to get the > complete reversal. > > Strictly speaking, the UDA shows only > > COMP + OCCAM => REVERSAL or LITTLENESS > > where LITTLENESS is the existence of a little concrete universe, > and little means not big enough to run the complete UD.
However, surely LITTLENESS is contradicted by observation. We live in a universe big enough to run the UD. Or have I missed something here? > > So I was right in my thesis not to use Occam, but the movie > graph instead. > > I guess you have seen that! > > Bye, > > Bruno > > PS If you believe OCCAM is incompatible with LITTLENESS, the > the UDA is enough. (But logically that is not obvious). > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Russell Standish Director High Performance Computing Support Unit, University of NSW Phone 9385 6967 Sydney 2052 Fax 9385 6965 Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED] Room 2075, Red Centre http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
