-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Thu, 18 May 2000, Higgo James wrote: > It seems to me that a good way of selecting one idea over is competition is > Occam's razor
I'm sorry... but just how does Occam's razor support the *verse? It would seem to me that the *verse/pleni is 100% the opposite of what the razor would appear to support. Even if it does, which I think it doesn't, does this absolutely *prove* the necessity and existence of the *verse? C'mon, JH, you're saying that everything exists... yet, you can selectively deny a few things that you just don't like. How can everything exist, yet you, yourself, have the ability to determine which do not without, somehow, taking away from your seeming belief that everything exists? List -- are we talking about reality/existence/et al, or the *beliefs* about reality/existence/et al. ? Are things getting confused? Scott ps: JH,how about this *verse? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBOSOhu1pGPE+AF6qBAQEQBgP/S1y3z/xEtMgcfpbY8G6XtEsntCzr6Ltf zWWo1oDK5witCaP//1eIoi7co2Wus28/hy3i0GEwuIFvIXiLLOujj4IMQqEPXgpp meqkIX/3kLP1J4xuccyZtx6DDNvA846CiK+qHTawjbNfu865P+I3YoRSRnbBoSib hr+FkMcaM50= =xxTN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
