Higgo James wrote:
> Trying to derive SE from AUH is like trying to derive 'Jacques Mallah' from
> AUH. 
> It's very easy: all universes exists, so some thoughts of the cleass "the SE
> is -i hbar d/dt psi = H psi" exist.
> Some thoughts of the class "why is  the SE -i hbar d/dt psi = H psi" also
> exist - and by WAP we shouldn't wonder why we *are* (not think, but are)
> such a thought. If we weren't, we wouldn't wonder it...
> James

This is a very glib response that doesn't do justice to the
question. In essence you are saying that the SE is due to some kind of
symmetry breaking. If true, than I will immediately ask what is the
symmetry that is being broken, and why is the symmetrical disallowed?

Dr. Russell Standish                     Director
High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967                    
UNSW SYDNEY 2052                         Fax   9385 6965                    
Australia                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]             
Room 2075, Red Centre                    http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks

  • Re: QM Russell Standish
    • Russell Standish

Reply via email to