Higgo James wrote: > > Trying to derive SE from AUH is like trying to derive 'Jacques Mallah' from > AUH. > > It's very easy: all universes exists, so some thoughts of the cleass "the SE > is -i hbar d/dt psi = H psi" exist. > > Some thoughts of the class "why is the SE -i hbar d/dt psi = H psi" also > exist - and by WAP we shouldn't wonder why we *are* (not think, but are) > such a thought. If we weren't, we wouldn't wonder it... > > James
This is a very glib response that doesn't do justice to the question. In essence you are saying that the SE is due to some kind of symmetry breaking. If true, than I will immediately ask what is the symmetry that is being broken, and why is the symmetrical disallowed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Russell Standish Director High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967 UNSW SYDNEY 2052 Fax 9385 6965 Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED] Room 2075, Red Centre http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
