Higgo James wrote:
> 
> Trying to derive SE from AUH is like trying to derive 'Jacques Mallah' from
> AUH. 
> 
> It's very easy: all universes exists, so some thoughts of the cleass "the SE
> is -i hbar d/dt psi = H psi" exist.
> 
> Some thoughts of the class "why is  the SE -i hbar d/dt psi = H psi" also
> exist - and by WAP we shouldn't wonder why we *are* (not think, but are)
> such a thought. If we weren't, we wouldn't wonder it...
> 
> James

This is a very glib response that doesn't do justice to the
question. In essence you are saying that the SE is due to some kind of
symmetry breaking. If true, than I will immediately ask what is the
symmetry that is being broken, and why is the symmetrical disallowed?


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Russell Standish                     Director
High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967                    
UNSW SYDNEY 2052                         Fax   9385 6965                    
Australia                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]             
Room 2075, Red Centre                    http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Re: QM Russell Standish
    • Russell Standish

Reply via email to