With reference to your message with the subject:
   "Re: Summary"

One or more addresses in your message have failed with the following
responses from the mail transport system:

   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   User 'lamh1' is not authorised to use mail.

Should you need assistance, please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-------------------- Returned message follows ---------------------

Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nyota.unn.ac.uk by ALDEAN.UNN.AC.UK (Mercury 1.13);
    Tue, 5 Oct 99 17:56:28 GMT
Received: from mx1.eskimo.com by nyota.unn.ac.uk with SMTP (XT-PP) with ESMTP;
          Tue, 5 Oct 1999 18:55:46 +0100
Received: (from smartlst@localhost)     by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) 
          id KAA00981;  Tue, 5 Oct 1999 10:28:12 -0700
Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 10:28:12 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 13:28:04 EDT
Subject: Re: Summary
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 62
Resent-Message-ID: <"RvIUJ.0.AF.iKZ-t"@mx1>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/1234
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 99-10-01 07:28:42 EDT, I wrote:

 >Sorry Russell I am not good with acronyms. 
 >
 >In a message dated 99-09-30 22:37:01 EDT, you write:
 >
 ><< the QTI issue. >>
 >
 >I assume it stands for Quantum Theory Interpretation???
 
Russell replies:

>yup!

Bruno replies:
 
>QTI = Quantum Theory of Immortality, see James Higgo initial and
>basic post on the subject:
 
>http://www.escribe.com/science/theory/index.html?mID=138
  

Moral: We Got To Be More Careful With Acronyms (WGTBMCWA).  :-)

George


Reply via email to