With reference to your message with the subject:
"Re: Summary"
One or more addresses in your message have failed with the following
responses from the mail transport system:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User 'lamh1' is not authorised to use mail.
Should you need assistance, please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------- Returned message follows ---------------------
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nyota.unn.ac.uk by ALDEAN.UNN.AC.UK (Mercury 1.13);
Tue, 5 Oct 99 17:56:28 GMT
Received: from mx1.eskimo.com by nyota.unn.ac.uk with SMTP (XT-PP) with ESMTP;
Tue, 5 Oct 1999 18:55:46 +0100
Received: (from smartlst@localhost) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8)
id KAA00981; Tue, 5 Oct 1999 10:28:12 -0700
Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 10:28:12 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 13:28:04 EDT
Subject: Re: Summary
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 62
Resent-Message-ID: <"RvIUJ.0.AF.iKZ-t"@mx1>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/1234
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 99-10-01 07:28:42 EDT, I wrote:
>Sorry Russell I am not good with acronyms.
>
>In a message dated 99-09-30 22:37:01 EDT, you write:
>
><< the QTI issue. >>
>
>I assume it stands for Quantum Theory Interpretation???
Russell replies:
>yup!
Bruno replies:
>QTI = Quantum Theory of Immortality, see James Higgo initial and
>basic post on the subject:
>http://www.escribe.com/science/theory/index.html?mID=138
Moral: We Got To Be More Careful With Acronyms (WGTBMCWA). :-)
George
