George, thanks for your reply, which is almost as convoluted and
hard-to-follow as was my question. You wrote:

> I am not restricting anything. I am only saying that Juergens has to
> between violating Bell's  inequality theorem and all that this implies, or
> and all that this implies. My stand is that we shouldn't.
>  George
So ;let me rephrase the question:
 is your stand that if an imaginary universe would violate eg. Bell's
theorem, it should be excluded from consideration as a possibility,
- or -
we should rather conclude that Bell's theorem (or any other fundemntal
"human" rule) has a limited validity and does not cover every possible

Reply via email to