Dear Bruno:

After looking at all of your recent posts re my questions I conclude that 
my Superverse idea and your UDA idea are cousins.  See also my just 
previous post re "Some progress I think".


My argument carries a rationale for a lowest level repeating 
scanner-duplicator type of behavior [i.e. stability], my Superverse is 
generated immediately and repeatedly at one end of that behavior,  the 
Superverse acts as "data food" for all my parallel computers which are 
actually comparators orchestrating isomorphic link shifts between all the 
patterns in the Superverse [link shifts = evolving universes], and it takes 
no selected information to construct all these computers since they are 
self contained in each link but such information though small seems 
necessary to construct the UD.



Reply via email to