Michiel de Jong wrote:

> George Levy writes:
>  > There is no "previous" in the sense of previous time, only in
>  > terms of logical antecedent.
> Did you write any papers on this, that I can download and read?
> I would be very much interested in reading some of your work on this.

Glad you asked. I wrote a whole book on this subject but couldn't find a
publisher (I was probably too far out and my name is not Descartes :-).
I'll eventually put it on the web when I have enough spare time from my
regular work. This list provides archives you can consult, in which I
explain my ideas.


PS. You have a nice home page.

Reply via email to