Yes, it was meant for the list. Bruno, you may remember that in the original question I specifically asked you _not_ to give me that answer! But I must confess the fact that your thesis is a) closely aregued and b) in French has meant I have not absorbed it fully. Sorry my crack at translation petered out - how is it getting on?
James ----- Original Message ----- From: Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; James Higgo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:52 PM Subject: Out of line ? > Hi Brent, Hi James, > > Thank you both for your commentaries. > Are you sure you want do that out of line ? or is it > an e-mailing error ? > > I begin also to understand why I have been > not straightforward in my (first) attempt to > answer James. The reason is that I am not > representative of the way "information science" > play a role in Physics. > > So an easy answer James could give to his friends is: > "Bruno seems having proved that if we are machine > then it is not consciousness which emerges from > the material universe(s), it is the material > universe(s) which emerge(s) from consciousness; and > the laws of nature becames deducible from the > psychology of machine". > But I agree it is not a standard answer. > Don't hesitate to criticize my proof ... > > Bruno >
